Steve tasker hall of fame pro#
Steve tasker hall of fame series#

Every single coach will answer yes, they are worth keeping. No matter what most people say, special Teams are an important part of the game, just ask the 2010 chargers which were ranked 1 in both def and offense by YPG, however their special teams is what held them back that year.ДЄsk any coach, when he is making cuts, if any player can prove their worth on special teams are worth keeping. Every other position should be allowed at least one pure position player in the Hall. The only really hard positions to justify ever getting into the Hall of Fame are long snapper and holder. Gale Sayers got in, in addition to his excellent play as a running back, the stats he had accumulated as a special teams player helped put him in the Hall of Fame.

Steve tasker hall of fame pro#

If the voters want to keep saying that special teams are not important than why do they bother giving them all pro nominations to special teams players.

These videos are 2 reasons to put him in the Hall of Fame, We have a punter and a kicker why not have a gunner as well. So, why should and shouldn't he be in the Hall of Fame? Discuss below.

This video does a good job of highlighting Tasker's career and what he became famous for, and it was done by NFL Network. There aren't that many stats on Tasker, because he was a gunner however, many call him the 'greatest special teamer of all-time,' and the first gunner to gain popularity. With Steve Tasker (Gunner 1985-1997), here are the notable stats: Your requests are the reason why I'm doing Steve Tasker he was the most-requested non-QB, retired player that I've gotten, without a doubt. The first person of the day is going to always be a more modern person the second one is always going to be an older person. Fire away with any suggestions that you might have. I'm listening to all of your responses, and I've got a whole list of players coming up. As always, if you have any suggestions, go ahead. Tasker is counting as a specialist, so that's why he is featured today. So, with all of that being said, the seventy-eighth person up for discussion is. Don't say 'He will never make the Hall of Fame because he doesn't have voter support' that's not the point. It's not about the voters it's not why he will or will not make the Hall of Fame. Much like the Super Bowl series, you list reasons as to why the player/coach SHOULD and SHOULDN'T make the Hall of Fame, listing both sides of the argument. Obviously, those shouldn't be the only things you base your answers on, but they should provide a reference to help you. I'll list some notable stats about that player/coach/owner. I won't list any joke answers (Blaine Gabbert), I won't list any players who are definitely getting in (Peyton Manning), and the only current players that will have their thread will be active players at the end of their careers (Frank Gore, Andre Johnson, etc.) I'm going to list a player/coach/owner (in this case, Steve Tasker).

Steve tasker hall of fame series#

Let's continue this series on borderline Hall of Fame people that should or shouldn't get inducted into Canton.